Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics
نویسنده
چکیده
This article provides an overview of recent developments in historical institutionalism. First, it reviews some distinctions that are commonly drawn between the “historical” and the “rational choice” variants of institutionalism and shows that there are more points of tangency than typically assumed. However, differences remain in how scholars in the two traditions approach empirical problems. The contrast of rational choice’s emphasis on institutions as coordination mechanisms that generate or sustain equilibria versus historical institutionalism’s emphasis on how institutions emerge from and are embedded in concrete temporal processes serves as the foundation for the second half of the essay, which assesses our progress in understanding institutional formation and change. Drawing on insights from recent historical institutional work on “critical junctures” and on “policy feedbacks,” the article proposes a way of thinking about institutional evolution and path dependency that provides an alternative to equilibrium and other approaches that separate the analysis of institutional stability from that of institutional change.
منابع مشابه
FIELD STATEMENT POLITICS DEPARTMENT: APPROACHES TO COMPARATIVE POLITICS: A CULTURAL POLITICS CRITIQUE INTRODUCTION APPROACHES Developmentalism Crisis in Modernization Dependency New Institutionalism Rational Choice Cultural Politics Cultural political analysis of the formal political realm Democracy POLITICAL CULTURE
متن کامل
New Institutionalism Politics: Integration of Old Institutionalism and Other Methodologies
In the process of transition from old institutionalism to new institutionalism, theoretical foundation of old institutionalism was gradually enlarged and more research approaches were integrated. Firstly, rational aspects of behavioristic politics as borrowed. Then, its epistemology, its research target and research level are expanded. Finally, relevant theories of economics, sociology and hist...
متن کاملHospitals, finance, and health system reform in Britain and the United States, c. 1910-1950: historical revisionism and cross-national comparison.
Comparative histories of health system development have been variously influenced by the theoretical approaches of historical institutionalism, political pluralism, and labor mobilization. Britain and the United States have figured significantly in this literature because of their very different trajectories. This article explores the implications of recent research on hospital history in the t...
متن کامل1 Comparative Politics Qualifying Examination
Virtually all comparativists, indeed virtually all social scientists, regardless of theoretical or methodological persuasion, agree that “institutions matter.” But how and why do they matter? And how should they be studied? Behind the deceptive consensus, there is considerable conflict among structuralists, rationalists, and culturalists in Comparative Politics regarding the theoretical and emp...
متن کاملCHAPTER 2 Institutional Theory
Although most political sociologists and political scientists nowadays either consider themselves or are deemed “institutionalists,” key differences remain among major schools of institutionalism (see reviews in Pierson and Skocpol 2002; Amenta 2005). In this chapter, we review sociological institutionalism, historical institutionalism, and political institutionalism. We discuss their similarit...
متن کامل